SFS 2nd Conference

SFS 2nd Conference

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

“RISE AGAINST PRIVATISATION AND COMMERCIALISATION OF EDUCATION”


SFS invites all to attend its 1st conference with the slogan to “RISE AGAINST PRIVATISATION AND COMMERCIALISATION OF EDUCATION” and make it successful.
DATE:  19th Feb, 2013                              TIME: 11 am                            VENUE:  English Auditorium, PU, Chandigarh
  
“RISE AGAINST PRIVATISATION AND   COMMERCIALISATION OF EDUCATION”

 
Now-a- days we see a rising discontent among people as the ‘promises’ of rapid development  made by the neo liberal policies in ‘90s have never been realized and the dreams of millions shattered with the absolute ‘failure’. Almost every section of our society is suffering.  The peasants are committing suicides, the workers are forced to starve on meager wages, the women are living under drastic conditions, the dalits are still subjected to live life in undermined conditions and face discrimination even in ‘respectable’ jobs and educational institutes, the youth is wandering jobless and have been pushed to lead a life of despair, killing a persons’ own creativity and the condition of the society is deteriorating day-by-day. And still the ruling class continues with its anti-people policies that favor a small privileged section of the society and exploit the broader masses of the society. Fed-up of such rule, the people have come forward and have shown their discontent through recent demonstrations. But the ruthless suppression of such democratic struggles by the state is a sign of shrinking democratic space. With the curtailment of fundamental rights it appears that we are on a way to an authoritarian rule. No doubt the educated youth of our country are willful and capable of changing the society but there is need to identify and address the root cause of the problems and build an alternative.
 One of the issues that require our prime attention and need to be addressed is our education system. Since education is necessarily an emancipatory process linked with the liberation of masses. It should emancipate individuals, groups, nations and nationalities from superstition and dominance. But education system of India seems to disagree with this phenomenon. It has always remained a distant dream for the broader masses. The origins of our formal education system dates back to the British times. (Prior to that, there was an indigenous system of education with formal schools for Brahmins, upper castes and the mercantile classes. Hardly any women or the dalit people received education.) It’s a well known fact that during the mid nineteenth century Macaulay education system was introduced for creating a class of persons who are “Indian in blood and colour, but English in taste, opinion, morals and in intellect…” to run their administrative apparatus. Indian ruling classes have also continued on the same lines after the ‘independence’.
The National Policy on Education (1986) was introduced with the concept of ‘model’ schools to create islands of excellence amidst the ocean of illiteracy. The policy also supported the funding of the institutions by both public and private sector as well as ‘voluntary agencies’, thus opening up the educational institutes for private hands.  It also proposed a ‘national core curriculum’ to be imposed in schools to let the centre govt. exercise its fascist and authoritarian grip over the country. In this manner the rich diverse culture and languages of our people were sacrificed at the altar of Hindu fascists.
The 2nd generation educational ‘reforms’ were proposed in ‘90s. Committees like Swaminathan committee and Punnayya committee proposed the resource mobilization in technical education by ‘cost recovery’ from students or to say in layman language hike in fees and introduction of ‘payment seats’.  It was seen even in very cheap form like maintenance fee, gardening fee, lending of premises of the institutions such as auditorium, classrooms, playgrounds etc . Later, the World Bank (in its document on Higher education, 1994) proposed that spending of public funds on higher education should be reduced i.e. privatize it. Very obediently in 1997 Ministry of Finance stated that “education beyond elementary level also falls outside the ambit of merit category”. The proposal simply meant withdrawal of state funding and privatization in all forms in higher education.  Further standards were proposed like NAAC to judge the performance of colleges and universities or rather to allow the institutes with high ranking to get an autonomous status and raise their fees.
 In 1999, the Anand Krishnan committee and Mehmood-ur-Rehman committee proposed 5 to 6 fold fee hikes  and illogically justified saying “higher fees gives sobriety to the system and to the institutions and is also helpful in maintaining law and order”. While on the other hand, somewhat ‘sincere’ recommendation of Kothari commission, which urged the govt. to invest 6% of the GDP in education, was completely ignored. The NDA govt. on the eve of the century continued on the path with gradual withdrawal of the funding of higher education. The frequent expenditures in the universities and colleges have to be raised through cost-recovery and other sources. Market-friendly courses were introduced and private investment was allowed in these courses. The private colleges and even universities funded by big corporate to be started. The NDA government also manipulated the subject matters especially history in the name ‘Bhartiyakaran’ of the education, defeating the very purpose of the scientific and rational education.
 In Ambani-Birla report (2000), these two industrialists asked for immediate privatization of several segments of higher education. In view of this they wanted a legislation “banning any form of political activity on campuses of universities and educational institutions”. In its continuity, the Lyngdoh committee also recommended harsh restrictions on political activities in educational campuses as it was necessary to create an ‘open environment’ that would encourage the private sector to invest in higher education as the World Bank in 2002 suggested in its report “Constructing Knowledge Societies”. It suggested that such rules should be formed that facilitate establishment of new institutions, outlining minimum quality requirements and did not constitute any barriers to entry for investment for private investors.
Such reforms are seriously affecting the society as now even the middle class has been denied the opportunities for education due to rising costs under policies of the privatization and commercialization of education. The oppressed section such as dalits and scheduled tribes, who earlier have been somewhat benefited from the reservation, are again being marginalized due to the increased costs of education. Either the educational institutions have been privatized or only the self financed courses are being introduced in the public institutions. Less than 2% of GDP is spent on education in contrast to 10% as recommended by Yashpal committee. There is much spending of public funds for ‘defence’ and stimulus packages to big corporates, while the primary sectors like education and health are totally ignored.
The public education plays a great role in nation building, but the education system in India produces professionals which are best suited to serve the needs of MNCs and are divorced from the needs of development of our country (i.e. benefit of the masses).
An irrational marks oriented exam-system has given rise to intense competition and the education has become a highly priced commodity (sold in coaching centers and private educational institutions) and only a few can afford it. A few who do manage to get a degree, wander jobless or get highly underpaid jobs with no job security at all.
Now the UPA government has been regularly introducing policies on dictation of Imperialist Masters accelerating the privatization and commercialization of education. It has introduced six education related bills stressing for centralization of all aspects of higher education(With this single-window system, the foreign educational institutes will find it easier to start their ‘shops’ in India), promoting FDI in education, setting up an alternative dispute redressal mechanism giving an easy way-out to private universities , mandatory accreditation of all educational institutes creating National Authority for Registration and Accreditation of Higher Educational Institutes( NARAHEI). Under Universities for Innovation and Research Bill, the universities will be started under MoAs, with govt. arranging lands, contribution to capital investment, grants for supporting research but afterwards these universities will be outside the jurisdiction of CAG, there will be no member of govt. in board of governors and therefore no control over these universities.
Higher and primary education is juxtaposed against each other in an ugly manner. On one hand for ‘providing’ primary education it is introducing Right to Education and while on the other hand it is withdrawing funds from higher education.
Hence the need of the hour is to recognize the issue and to raise our voice against privatization and commercialization of education, to get organized to struggle for our basic right of education and to transform the education system and society where education will be free for all.